Today we’re testing Surfshark vs PIA (Private Internet Access), two well-known VPNs with large user bases and strong reputations. While both services promise fast speeds, strong security, and streaming support, our hands-on testing revealed some big differences — especially when it comes to features and speed test results.
This comparison guide will help you figure out which VPN is the better fit for your needs in 2025 by breaking down the latest data across speed, privacy, pricing, and usability. Here are the main facts about each VPN:
| Surfshark | PIA | |
| Website | Surfshark.com | Privateinternetaccess.com |
| Location | The Netherlands | United States |
| Servers | 3,200+ | 35,000+ |
| Countries | 100 | 91 |
| Logs | No logs (audited) | No logs (audited) |
| Torrenting | All servers | All servers |
| Support | Knowledge Base; 24/7 chat | Knowledge Base; 24/7 chat |
| Apps for | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS | Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS |
| Price | $1.99 | $2.03 |
| Coupon | 87% Off Coupon > | 83% Off Coupon > |
PIA was once one of the leading VPNs on the market — but a lot has changed. It has fallen behind in recent years with both performance and features now lagging behind the competition. In addition, a few years ago it was sold off to a company that is often associated with malware and adware (but we'll explain why in more detail below).
Meanwhile, Surfshark is one of today's best VPN services and it continues to gain popularity. It offers excellent speeds with the WireGuard VPN protocol and comes packed with features. In this comparison, we'll find out whether Private Internet Access or Surfshark is the leader in these eight categories:
- Company and Jurisdiction
- Features
- Speeds
- Security and Encryption
- Privacy and Logs
- Netflix, Streaming, and Torrenting
- Reliability and Support
- Price and Value
Let's get down to work.
Company and Jurisdiction for Surfshark and PIA
| Surfshark | Private Internet Access | |
| Jurisdiction | Netherlands | United States |
| Five Eyes | ❌ | ✔️ |
More and more people around the world are using a VPN to protect their online privacy. Using sophisticated encryption techniques, a quality VPN will prevent outsiders from seeing what you are doing online.
However, people often forget that their VPN provider could potentially see their traffic. While in an ideal world, a VPN provider would never spy on users and risk the company's reputation, this most certainly is not an ideal world. A few VPNs have been found to spy on their users, typically under duress from the government of the jurisdiction where they are based.
Knowing a bit about the company and jurisdiction they are based in will make it easier to decide if you can trust them.
Surfshark company and jurisdiction
Surfshark LTD was incorporated in 2018. Since that time, they have maintained a sterling reputation for providing secure, private VPN services to a large and growing audience. We know of no privacy or security violations with this service. Surfshark VPN has also passed independent security audits performed by respectable firms such as Cure53 and Deloitte.
Surfshark is based in The Netherlands. While this is not a great jurisdiction, being located in Europe, it is also not horrible. The Netherlands is not a member of the infamous 5 Eyes alliance (US, UK, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand). Additionally, Surfshark has a strict no-logs policy and also a great track record.
Private Internet Access company and jurisdiction
For many years, Private Internet Access had an excellent reputation in the privacy community. However, as we noted in our PIA review, things began to slowly change. Support deteriorated, debt accumulated, and eventually, the company founders decided to sell out.
In 2019 Kape purchased Private Internet Access. Kape was previously named Crossrider, a company that has often been associated with malware. However, in our investigation of Crossrider and Kape, we learned that Crossrider simply produced a browser development platform, which was then used by malicious third parties to distribute malware. Today, Kape also owns CyberGhost VPN, ZenMate VPN, and most recently, Kape purchased ExpressVPN.
PIA has also undergone third-party audits of its no-logs policy. Additionally, Private Internet Access is based in the United States, which is one of the worst jurisdictions in the world for a privacy-focused business. There have been many cases of the US government forcing US VPNs or email providers to collect data on users for various investigations. For example, we have seen this happen with Lavabit, IPVanish, and RiseUp. Consequently, we do not recommend any US-based VPN, including PIA, due to the security and privacy risks (we covered this issue more in our NordVPN vs IPVanish comparison).
There's a clear winner in this category, and that is Surfshark.
Private Internet Access vs Surfshark features comparison
A VPN that doesn't have the features you need is worthless (to you). This section gives a quick overview of each VPN's feature set.
| Feature | Private Internet Access | Surfshark VPN |
|---|---|---|
| Split tunneling | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| RAM-only servers | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Kill Switch | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Private DNS | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Logs | No logs (audited) | No logs (audited) |
| Multiple VPN protocols | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Double VPN servers | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Obfuscated servers | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Dedicated IP servers | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Static IP servers | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Onion over VPN servers | ❌ | ❌ |
| P2P servers | ❌ | ✔️ |
| Rotating IP addresses | ❌ | ✔️ |
| Browser extensions | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Built-in ad blocking | ✔️ | ✔️ |
Surfshark features
Surfshark is full of useful features. Start with their super fast network of around 3,200 servers in 100 countries. Surfshark runs all servers in RAM-disk mode, which eliminates the need for hard drives and also means no data can ever be stored on a server. We also see this server feature with both NordVPN and ExpressVPN.
Surfshark also offers different types of specialty servers:
- P2P servers that are optimized for fast torrenting speeds (one of the best VPNs for torrenting)
- Static IP servers provide you with a fixed (static) IP address every time you connect to them. This address is shared amongst many Surfshark users.
- Dedicated IP servers are static IP servers that are dedicated to your sole use. These are available for an additional monthly fee.
- Trust DNS are private and secure DNS servers that anyone can use
- MultiHop (Double-VPN) servers to encrypt traffic over two separate locations (an extra layer of security)
The MultiHop servers are very useful for anyone wanting an extra layer of encryption with two VPN servers. A prominent feature of Surfshark is the ability to create your own custom MultiHop server configurations. You would click the Create Connection button shown in the preceding image to start defining your own MultiHop configurations.
Surfshark also has a Camouflage mode feature that allows you to get through network restrictions. This is useful if you need a good VPN for China or any other location where VPNs are blocked, including work and school networks.
Need a VPN for all of your devices? Surfshark offers a huge selection of apps with built-in protection against leaks. All the basics are covered: Windows, Mac OS, Android, iOS, and Linux. Surfshark is also a great VPN for gaming systems, Smart TVs, and VPN routers.
What’s more, putting a VPN on the router allows you to use Apple TV with your VPN. Lastly, if you need a VPN for Firestick, Surfshark has you covered with a dedicated app in the Amazon App Store.
All of the above apps include an effective kill switch which acts to keep your traffic off the internet if you lose the VPN connection. Surfshark's VPN apps offer some great features, including:
- Bypasser, which is a split-tunneling VPN feature that allows you to route apps or websites outside the VPN tunnel
- Leak protection with a kill switch to ensure there are no IPv4, IPv6, or DNS leaks
- CleanWeb, which blocks ads, trackers, and malware domains
The CleanWeb feature is a great VPN ad blocker to improve privacy and security, beyond just encrypting traffic. CleanWeb can also improve page load speeds since ads and trackers can eat up lots of resources.
CleanWeb 2.0 is a more advanced version of CleanWeb that is currently only available in the Surfshark browser extensions for Android and iOS. This is an excellent feature to enable when using a VPN for Android or iOS mobile devices.
Malware protection is getting to be a “must-have” feature as cybercriminals become ever more aggressive and creative in their attacks. Recently the FBI warned consumers about the flood of fake ads in search results. These ads imitate legitimate brands, but instead of taking you to your favorite store, they take you to phishing sites or try to ram malware into your system.
There are also paid add-ons you can include in your VPN subscription:
- Alert, which monitors for theft of your private information
- Search, a private search engine that helps keep the spies off your trail
- Antivirus, an anti-virus that Surfshark users can install for additional protection
- Dedicated IP, a static IP address that only you can use, useful for secure logins and avoiding CAPTCHAs
- Alternative ID, is a newer feature that lets you create alternative email addresses and personas that you can give to websites and advertisers without exposing your real personal data.
And perhaps the top feature of all: support for unlimited simultaneous connections. Most VPNs provide you with about five or six simultaneous connections. Surfshark gives you as many connections as you want under a single subscription.
See all Surfshark features here >
PIA features
We've already touched on PIA's move to support the WireGuard protocol, which is a feature many VPNs still do not have. Beyond that, however, Private Internet Access is fairly simple. Their apps include a kill switch and a basic VPN ad blocker called PIA MACE. Ad blocking with VPNs is becoming more common — we also see it with CyberGhost and NordVPN.
Servers – PIA claims to have 35,000 servers in 91 countries. That is truly a huge number, although it is surprising that with so many servers they don't provide any special-purpose servers, or for that matter better speeds during testing. It also appears that most of these are virtual server locations, rather than physical servers. You can see these are labeled as “geo-located” on their server page.
Below is the PIA Windows app I tested. And while it's not the best VPN for Windows systems, the PIA desktop app did not have any bugs or crashes in my tests.
Surfshark has a richer feature set, without a doubt. It wins the Surfshark vs PIA features category.
Surfshark vs Private Internet Access speeds
If a VPN service is too slow, everything you do online through the VPN will be a real drag. Because both Surfshark and PIA now support the WireGuard protocol, we would expect them to be fast. Let's see what the tests reveal.
We run our speed tests using the fastest VPN protocol supported by each service. That means WireGuard for both of these contenders. All our speed testing was conducted on a 1000 Mbps internet connection using the latest VPN apps.
Test #1: Los Angeles
Surfshark Los Angeles speed test results: 653 Mbps.
Right away we see Surfshark performing at an extremely high level, above 600 Mbps. Can PIA match this?
Here was the Private Internet Access server speed for Los Angeles: 263 Mbps.
Surfshark was about 2.5 times faster than PIA for the Los Angeles test run — quite a big difference.
Test #2: Seattle
Surfshark Seattle results: 752 Mbps.
An impressive test result from Surfshark, surpassing the 700 Mbps threshold this time.
Here was the PIA Seattle server speed: 299 Mbps.
This is another slow-speed test result from Private Internet Access. PIA's Seattle speeds were only slightly faster than their Los Angeles results, but still much slower than Surfshark.
Test #3: New York
Surfshark New York results: 637 Mbps.
Few VPNs have ever been this fast with the New York server location.
PIA New York results: 500 Mbps.
PIA turned in a much better result this time. However, it couldn't match Surfshark's speeds, again. We see Surfshark is among the best VPN for USA server speeds in these tests.
Test #4, United Kingdom
Here's a transatlantic test, connecting to London, UK.
Surfshark UK speed test results: 556 Mbps.
This kind of speed helped Surfshark make our list of the best VPNs for the UK. And here we can also see that even with higher latency (ping), Surfshark still delivers excellent performance.
PIA London, UK results: 261 Mbps.
For the UK location, Surfshark was about twice as fast as PIA.
Here's a table showing all the speed test results in one place for easy reference:
| Location | Surfshark | PIA VPN |
| Los Angeles | 653 Mbps | 263 Mbps |
| Seattle | 752 Mbps | 299 Mbps |
| New York | 637 Mbps | 500 Mbps |
| London, UK | 556 Mbps | 261 Mbps |
PIA has fallen far behind in the Surfshark vs PIA speed category. We found similar results in our NordVPN vs Private Internet Access comparison. This is interesting, especially since PIA supports WireGuard and you would expect better speeds.
Security and Encryption: Private Internet Access and Surfshark
Protecting your privacy requires a VPN to have excellent security. And that means excellent encryption, along with any other special security measures a service might take. Here is what each VPN offers in terms of security and encryption.
This category shows a lot of promise for PIA. That's because both Surfshark and PIA use the WireGuard VPN protocol along with OpenVPN. Their WireGuard implementations use ChaCha20 encryption and other advanced encryption technology. Their OpenVPN implementations use AES-256 encryption.
| VPN protocols supported | |
| Surfshark | OpenVPN UDP, OpenVPN TCP, IPSec/IKEv2, WireGuard |
| PIA | OpenVPN UDP, OpenVPN TCP, IPSec/IKEv2, and WireGuard |
Both Surfshark and PIA offer strong security, but it’s worth noting that PIA has also upgraded its infrastructure to use RAM-only (diskless) servers — just like Surfshark. This means all data is stored temporarily in volatile memory and wiped with every reboot, eliminating the risk of data persistence on physical drives.
This RAM-only setup ensures that even if a server were seized, it would contain no retrievable user data. It's a significant privacy enhancement and puts PIA on equal footing with Surfshark when it comes to this advanced server-side protection.
Privacy and Logs: Is Surfshark or PIA best?
| Surfshark | PIA | |
| Audited no-logs policy | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Audited By | Deloitte | Deloitte |
| Warrant Canary | ✔️ | ❌ |
In this section we cover the privacy policy of each VPN, what logs they keep (it better be none), and anything else about them that could compromise your privacy.
Surfshark privacy and logs
Surfshark is an audited no-logs VPN provider. Deloitte audited Surfshark and the results of this successful audit were published in January of 2023. In addition, the Surfshark Privacy Policy and Terms of Service confirm that the only information they record is your email address and billing info. None of your online activity is logged.
Finally, Surfshark maintains a warrant canary to warn about privacy-related issues. At the time of this review, we have not seen any reports in the warrant canary about surveillance or data collection activities.
PIA privacy and logs
PIA has both strengths and weaknesses in the privacy and logs category. For strengths, it is a verified no logs VPN service, having been validated by Deloitte Audit Romania, as well as in two different court cases. Private Internet Access includes an internet kill switch, as well as PIA MACE, a feature that blocks ads, trackers, and malware. You can see both of these features in the image below:
But this is less reassuring when you remember that PIA is based in the United States. This means it could be forced to log users at any time by US authorities, as we have seen at least three times before. They could also be forced to do this logging under a gag order. Such an order would prevent PIA from notifying their users that such surveillance was going on, regardless of PIA's own policies and agreements with their users.
Another issue is that PIA is now part of a large VPN conglomerate falling under Kape Technologies. This may or may not be a good development, depending on your opinion and if you want an independent VPN service.
Netflix, Streaming, and Torrenting
When it comes to Netflix and streaming, the difference is pretty stark.
Surfshark Netflix and streaming performance
Surfshark is fast and unblocks a huge selection of services. It is one of the best VPNs for streaming. For instance, Surfshark officially supports 17 different Netflix regions. Below I'm streaming US Netflix through a Surfshark server in Seattle with no problems.
But that's not all. Surfshark is also a reliable VPN for BBC iPlayer, HBO Max, DAZN, Disney+, Hulu, and more.
PIA Netflix and streaming performance
According to our tests (and PIA's support staff), Private Internet Access gets blocked by Netflix much of the time. They also have trouble with other top streaming services like Hulu. Below you can see PIA getting blocked by Netflix in our tests. Suffice to say, it is not among the best VPNs for Netflix.
Surfshark is the winner when it comes to Netflix and streaming.
When it comes to torrenting (P2P file transfers), things are a little more nuanced. Our testing shows that Surfshark is among the best VPNs for torrenting. With leak protection and kill switches built into their apps, this is a very fast network that allows torrenting and P2P downloads on every server.
PIA is also solid on the technology side of the issue, if not as fast as we would like. And while they do support port forwarding, which is beneficial for torrenting, the speeds are too slow. This prevents us from recommending PIA for torrenting or any other high-bandwidth activity.
Reliability and Support
| Surfshark VPN | Private Internet Access | |
| 24/7 Live Chat | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| ✔️ | ✔️ | |
| Articles | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| FAQs | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Support Tickets | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Subreddit | ✔️ | ✔️ |
Surfshark is a reliable service. We had no problems with the VPN during our testing. We did, however, communicate with their 24/7 live chat customer support team on a few different occasions. We found the support team to be quick to respond, and very helpful.
Private Internet Access was also reliable during our testing. While PIA does offer email and live chat support, we had some issues when we tried to contact them for help. There was nobody available for live chat support, as you can see here:
Price and Value Comparison
| Surfshark plans | Starter | One | One+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1-month | $15.45/month | $17.95/month | $20.65/month |
| 1-year | $3.19/month | $3.39/month | $6.09/month |
| 2-year | $1.99/month | $2.49/month | $3.99/month |
Deal: Get 87% OFF Surfshark 2-year plans >
Surfshark offers three different pricing tiers. The Surfshark Starter plan is slightly more affordable than PIA's standard plan when you choose the two-year subscription. Surfshark also provides Surfshark One and Surfshark One+ plans, which come with extra features like around-the-clock antivirus protection, webcam security, and identity protection — services that go beyond basic VPN functionality.
Surfshark is one of the cheapest VPNs in the industry that is still high quality. It even beat out NordVPN in the price category for the NordVPN vs Surfshark comparison. Surfshark offers a 30-day money-back guarantee with all subscription plans.
PIA's pricing is one of its strong points. As you can see above, their prices are only a bit higher than Surfshark's. Private Internet Access is certainly a cheap VPN service at an affordable price. And just like Surfshark, PIA subscriptions come with a 30-day money-back guarantee.
Based on price and value, Surfshark wins this one. In comparison to PIA, Surfshark is much faster, offers far more features, streams content better, and comes from a solid company based in a privacy-friendly jurisdiction. We see similar findings in Surfshark vs PIA Reddit threads.
Where VPNs offer different capabilities or performance, your circumstances and needs determine which one provides the most value to you. But at other times, one service will be a better value under virtually any circumstances.
This is our situation here. Surfshark does everything that PIA does, all at a better price. And it does each of those things as well or better, while also having a better privacy record and being based in a better privacy jurisdiction.
Conclusion: Surfshark Wins Big
| Category | Winner |
| Company and Jurisdiction | Surfshark |
| Features | Surfshark |
| Speeds | Surfshark |
| Security and Encryption | Tie |
| Privacy and Logs | Surfshark |
| Netflix, Streaming, and Torrenting | Surfshark |
| Reliability and Support | Surfshark |
| Price and Value | Surfshark |
Surfshark won nearly every category, although a couple were close. It is the better value and is one of the best VPN providers out there. We can recommend Surfshark without reservations.
If you decide to give Surfshark a try, you'll have plenty of time to put it through the ringer. We expect you'll like what you see, and with their 30-day money-back guarantee you have nothing to lose.
That said, Private Internet Access is still a solid VPN that holds its own in many areas. With its strong commitment to open-source transparency, customizable features, and reliable performance, it remains a trustworthy option — especially for users who value control and configurability. It’s certainly worth to try out PIA to see if it fits your specific needs.
Related Articles:
- Private Internet Access Review
- Surfshark VPN Review
- Surfshark VPN Coupon
- ExpressVPN vs PIA (Private Internet Access)
- ExpressVPN Coupon
- NordVPN vs PIA (Private Internet Access)
- NordVPN Coupon
Have you used either of these VPN providers? Feel free to share your honest review in the comments below.
Leave a Reply